SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Electro-Optical Systems Corp. (EOSC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J Durante who wrote (143)3/26/1998 10:12:00 AM
From: MIKE R.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 242
 
JOHN:

IT SEEMS THAT THE MAIN PROBLEM THAT THE SEC HAS IS THAT EOSC ALLOWED ORIGINAL INVESTORS TO SELL THEIR STOCK ON THE OPEN MARKET EARLIER THAN THEY SHOULD HAVE. EOSC APPARENTLY RECEIVED BAD ADVICE FROM THEIR LAWYER, AND HE THOUGHT THAT IT WAS ALLOWABLE. MANY OF THE ORIGINAL INVESTORS PAID .50 PER SHARE, AND WERE THUS REWARDED HANDSOMELY AT OUR EXPENSE. FSS, THE "PUMP AND DUMP" COMPANY, WAS POSSIBLY (JUST A POSSIBILITY, NOT BASED ON ANY FACTS) PAID BY THESE INVESTORS, BUT EOSC APPARENTLY HAD NOTHNG TO DO WITH FSS.

WE SHOULD HEAR SOMETHNG BY TOMORROW.



To: J Durante who wrote (143)4/14/1998 4:47:00 PM
From: John Arnopp  Respond to of 242
 
Any info on what's up? I've been following (thankfully from the sidelines) because I'm interested in similar technologies (Who? Vision Systems whovision.com and Axcess, Inc. axsi.com). If the company were for real, then how come these downloads for "support" to products don't work (and don't seem to have ever worked): eosc.com. I would like to think this company has something to offer, but it appears to be only a well-constructed scam.