SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : SNDT - Sand Technology - A diamond in the sand -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Yarek Szolomicki who wrote (609)3/26/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: wanzer  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1200
 
If this keeps up I will need a Nucleus to compute my cost basis!!! I keep buying as the shares become available. Yarek, I think the quote(s) you are looking for are from the 3/17/98 news release and the comments came from Shumway of Digital. While Sand has tremendous technology at their fingertips, they do lack public relations sizzle if you know what I mean. Despite the product, endorsements, and partnerships, Sand is not going to take in a billion dollars next week or even next month as some might have been expecting to hear. I didn't sell at 4 or 5 or 6 so why would I now.



To: Yarek Szolomicki who wrote (609)3/26/1998 12:27:00 PM
From: DeeDee M  Respond to of 1200
 
The press release was last released on Mar. 19.(s)
..'"We have seen customers achieve great results utilizing Nucleus on the DIGITAL UNIX platform," said Herb Shumway, vice president, Software Partner Group, Digital....." ..Mr Shumway adds, "Nucleus significantly reduces the warehouse and/or mart implementation time, providing an immediate business impact - a powerful asset to consultants and integrator implementing corporate repository initiatives."'...



To: Yarek Szolomicki who wrote (609)3/26/1998 3:32:00 PM
From: DeeDee M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1200
 
Ooops. Looks like Mr. Shumway is a Digital VP. Am I wrong?
Checked out the Digital Nation site yet? ..anyone? (DN.com, I think, (digital-compaq)). How did anyone else read this article?