SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Frederick who wrote (11021)3/26/1998 11:14:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen  Respond to of 20681
 
Tom, Lawerence,

I suspect you are both on the right track. I have also speculated that the nature the deposit was created over the centuries will lead to variance in concentration at varying depths and zones. It also appears that the nature of the deposit itself is that there is a degree of variability even within fairly close proximity. If you think of the nature of the sedimentation process and that there was probably a great deal of structural variety on the surface as the process took place that seems to make sense.

It will be interesting to see how the numbers stack up as the holes are drilled. I suspect we will get a picture that will show a certain variation in grade and point towards areas that will be more profitable to attack first.

Henry



To: Tom Frederick who wrote (11021)3/26/1998 11:26:00 AM
From: JoshinLA  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 20681
 
To All,
Reading over March 18th press release, I was wondering why CMRI did not test the sample 43, 53, 49, 48, with the Johnson method.
to see the comparison. Just a thought. that's all. Yes I own Naxos stock. Yes I'm long on Naxos. JMHO I would have loved to see the comparison
go blue!
Josh