Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (31128)	3/26/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: rd greer	Respond to of 41046

Smart move. Suggest you pass over the ones from ValueSpec. They're useless to all but it. rd

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (31128)	3/26/1998 1:04:00 PM
From: Pat Garaffa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

ValueLess Dueschbag Spec writes: >>The use of a stop is "insurance money". Sometimes it pays to use it, and sometimes it doesn't. However, for that catostrophic situation, INSURANCE (stops) is a must. Also, the larger the possible loss likely, if I use a stop, the less money I might risk on that investment.<< Your pretty smart aren't you! I guess you take us all for a bunch of fools. I'm sure you and those kind hearted MMs would just love us to take your advice and put stops at $2.00-2.50. What you also forgot to mention was that you, ValueLess, have a buy order in slightly higher than my stop. Example: I put in a $2.00 stop, 10 minutes later the mms drop the bid and scoop em' up! They win - I lose. I cry - you laugh. I'm beginning to wonder if you're alone or working with some of the MM's? I have to commend you Mr. Dueschbag - You really are a crafty little Spec - come on over here so I can thank you personally. I have a #34 Louisville Slugger and I'de love to give you a wood shampoo. I bet you got your butt kicked alot when you were a kid. Your still a putz! Now please go away! Love and Kisses, - Pat

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (31128)	3/26/1998 1:08:00 PM
From: George Risonetti	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

Mr VALUESPEC, I will make this kind, or at least I hope you feel that this is not unjustly harsh. I have been a lurker on this thread for a few weeks and must say that I have appreciated the posts that you have made, whether of a positive or negative nature, and I viewed with great scrutiny the response you have received, and could not understand it. I did not understand it before the past few days, but perhaps I understand it a bit better now. "The fact that FTEL went under $ 3.00 is not surprising. If it stays there, that will be (even for me). FTEL: $2.97b $ 3.06a (just went up)" You even note that it had already gone up, so this is more of a recap, not a prediction, is it not? This is the quote from your previous post, that you just quoted. Now I have a problem with the way you re-worded it when you quoted yourself. "[based on mm activities and shares]" If you are going to quote yourself to prove a point you should do so verbatim, as it clearly is misleading with the way you did that, but that is not a major problem, I shall continue. "On a technical basis, I gave a buy when FTEL was about $ 3.00." Can you please direct me to the post where you made a technical recommendation of 3, or even close to that. If you refer to the first quote of yours, I do not consider that a buy recomendation. Also you have have stated that it was on a technical basis, yet I see that you did not state a basis for why you felt 3 was a good buy or that 3 was a buy. I did see where you stated that you had begun trading this stock, when it was at 3.71, so I am genuinely confused as to why you purchased, and that is an assumption I make from your use of the term trading, above 3. I see this more as hindsight being 20-20 then any predictions you have made. Could you help me understand these points? This is not to attack, as others have done, but simply to have clarified what you actually said.

To: VALUESPEC who wrote (31128)	3/26/1998 2:20:00 PM
From: Grego	Respond to of 41046

A kind word for VALUESPEC.............hmmm... just can't find one. Do you honestly expect the individuals of this thread to respond to you kindly as you repeatedly poop on their investments? Now I'm pretty new around here, so I mostly keep my mouth shut and listen. What I have learned is that most folks around here don't care about a thing you have to say (myself included). With that in mind, it just amazes me why you find it necessary to come here and make yourself heard. What a waste of time. Your self-serving investment advice seems to mostly fall on deaf ears as very few here seem to find valuation to your speculation. Do not respond to this message as it makes no difference and it wastes valuable air space. I would ask you to please STOP CRAPPING IN MY NEST!! I apologize to all else for the OFF TOPIC post. Keepa rockin'! Greg