Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Hernandez who wrote (51305)	3/26/1998 12:04:00 PM
From: Jock Hutchinson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Bill: I agree that it could be received as suspect, but this is clearly the best time to clear the decks of past mistakes, and if IOM is going to be a 10 Billion dollar company, it MUST regain credibility with the investing public. And people who view yesterday's CEO change as simply a "difference in philosophy" are being silly and kidding themselves as they retreat into denial over their near term poor investment. I mean analogizing IOM's replacing Kim Edwards to Intel's replacing Andy Grove is ludicrous. This is a company in crisis that still has a chance to retain its newly minted brand name and move forward. Accordingly, I would get all of the bad news out front---take my beating for the next year to eighteen months, and move forward.