Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Concurrent Computer (CCUR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Christiaan McDonald who wrote (3052)	3/26/1998 12:57:00 PM
From: jeffbas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21143

Except that this time, by the time he realized it wasn't going to 2 1/2 he probably had to buy back at 2 3/4. But, I am not sure he is really trying to talk it down. The chart does show a gap around 2 3/8 like he said, and the bottoms rising 1/4 point on each pullback would also have indicated low 2's again. The only think that made me suspicious that the pattern might not repeat was the really extreme volume this time.

To: Christiaan McDonald who wrote (3052)	3/26/1998 5:02:00 PM
From: steve olivier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21143

Ken, I am really disappointed in you. I believe that most people on this thread are independent thinkers and I know would not act on what anyone has to say. I view this thread as a forum where people can exchange ideas and have some fun with others who take things too seriously. If anyone thinks they can effect the direction of the stock with their comments, they are crazy (I agree with satchmo on that). I try to give people my thoughts on where the stock is going in the short term based on TA and you say I am trying to talk the stock down. You must admit my recent calls have been good. You have no idea what I own in my investment account or what I own in my trading account, but I am glad you think you have me figured out. I have you right where I want you. Just another angry post.