Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Robinett who wrote (9071)	3/26/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: White Shoes	Respond to of 13594

[no message]

To: Steve Robinett who wrote (9071)	3/26/1998 7:19:00 PM
From: Jason Cogan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13594

Steve: Writing calls by itself is a proxy for a short position. I never said that it behaves exactly like shorting the stock. It has a different risk reward profile, and one that I often like better. The reason I call it a "synthetic short" is because of the following. When shorting a stock, the speculator knows both the price of the short and the amount of shares he is short. He also begins to win/lose dollar for dollar. When writing a call, the investor knows the price of the short, but in actuality, the amount of shares remains uncertain. At higher prices, the investor is short the full amount of the contracts. At lower prices, it's as if he shorted fewer shares. How many fewer? Simply take the premium received divided by the ending differential between strike and expiration price. Whatever the number, that's the number of shares you've synthetically shorted. Hope this helps, Jason