Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : PYNG Technologies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: esxtarus who wrote (1617)	3/26/1998 8:02:00 PM
From: Sapper	Respond to of 8117

Esxtarus: Yes I have some comments. If you check the Profile of the poster at message #1572, you'll clearly see that it was made by m.jacobs. In other words Michael Jacobs, President of Pyng. The same person that has posted all of the other Pyng updates and comments. Now if it is not him, then it means that someone stole his password - that I find highly unlikely. Just another diversionary technique to create doubt in the minds of we shareholders. You have to expect this type of comment - the naysayers are out in full force - just ignore them! Sapper

To: esxtarus who wrote (1617)	3/26/1998 8:13:00 PM
From: T Lamos	Respond to of 8117

Although it's true that for some reason or another he didn't conclude his letter this one time acknowledging his title with respect to the company hierarchy, I'm nevertheless confident it was the head honcho in the cyberflesh. I base this conclusion on the fact that when I clicked on his (the poster's) name within the letter you refer to, the SI system brought me to Mr. Jacobs summary page where all of his other postings are also maintained. If it were another person posting, the system would have brought me to someone else's summary. Perhaps a very highly-accomplished hacker could in theory forge a letter, but to what end in this case? To merely set the record straight for GBM for the umpteenth time? I doubt it. There would be nothing to gain as an imposter. But if you really had to know for sure, one could give Mr. Jacobs a phone call to verify it was really him. Having said that, I personally wouldn't recommend picking up the phone. We should save the more important questions and concerns for this very busy gentleman. In any case, there's no doubt in my mind it was him. And if I recall correctly, it was posted at around 1am - not exactly the most alert time of anyone's hard-working day, especially Mr. Jacob's.