Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (4916)	3/27/1998 2:23:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Respond to of 18444

The only harrassment I see here is harrasment of a couple of dissenting voices, in an attempt to drive us from the thread. As to Hayton, sure my opinion is still open on him. And on Al Capone. And Jesse James. And The Hillside Strangler. Maybe they really weren't bad guys - they just made a few mistakes, and needed one more chance to prove themselves honorable. Yea, this time is different. IF it could be proven that Hayton had no significant ownership or control of the company, a tremendous load would be taken off. Then, you'd ONLY have the history of repeated failures and name changes preceeding NETZ (but this time is different), lack of financial statements (and a history in previous incarnations of not releasing financial statements, but this time is different), the mass resignations, public statments of doubt made by customers, etc. etc. etc. Yes, indeed, if it could be proven that Hayton has nothing to do with this, boy, there would be a LOT less negative about this stock! ;)