Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : The Panda Project (PNDA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JAGUAR who wrote (1037)	3/27/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: CatLady	Respond to of 1521

This is all starting to sound familiar..... Message 3433508 Message 3442169 Message 3493776 Why should anyone believe your rumors? They weren't true before, what's changed?

To: JAGUAR who wrote (1037)	3/27/1998 3:43:00 PM
From: Mike Farmwald	Respond to of 1521

I have talked to several Intel senior packaging people, and they think Panda/VSPA is a nonstarter. They were from Santa Clara and Oregon. If you care to give me names, I would be happy to call them. Mike

To: JAGUAR who wrote (1037)	3/27/1998 4:03:00 PM
From: Mitchell Ryan	Respond to of 1521

<<Mike, you have not talked to intel packaging people, because if you have you would be alot wiser!>> I can corroborate Mike's statement. A few years back, Crane did have a meeting with Intel in which one of Intel's senior packaging people was present. The result was that Intel does not consider him to be credible. I'm sure he's trying to find new ways to penetrate Intel, but is he really talking to the decision makers? Besides, if VSPA was so great, why wouldn't a company like Intel (which invests heavily in emerging tech companies) offer funding? Why did Panda have to resort to discount convertibles? Ryan