Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AK2004 who wrote (18740)	3/27/1998 5:56:00 PM
From: Sonny McWilliams	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27012

Albert. If they keep that pricing up and make no profit, I don't know, that does not sound to me like a long term business practice. You never know, VG on the main Intel thread was calling for this going under some time in the near future? All I am saying is, you can't stay in business forever if you make no profit. Well, maybe some people can. gg. BTW, give me a hint. DEC is being taken over and if that ever happened to AMD, who would it be? Who would love to have all those losses? Sonny

To: AK2004 who wrote (18740)	3/28/1998 9:17:00 AM
From: Fred Fahmy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27012

Albert, <One way or another it (AMD) would be bailed out > Do you think CYRX investors were happy with the deal they received from NSM?? Do you think they are happy now with NSM's performance? Just because someone might rescue AMD from the brink of bankruptcy, doesn't mean it will be favorable to AMD investors. When you are on the verge of going out of business, you don't have much leverage. Any prospective AMD buyer is going to think long and hard about buying a company bleeding so much red ink, especially after the NSM/CYRX debacle which so far has been a disaster for NSM. AMD needs new leadership and new management bad. As long as Jerry is around AMD's long term prospects remain the same, i.e. year after year the company will lose money, year after year the stock will stay flat (except for periods of sucker rallies like the many we have seen in the past), and Jerry will continue to get rich. FF