To: EPS who wrote (21447 ) 3/28/1998 9:01:00 AM From: dwight vickers Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 42771
(OFF TOPIC) Victor, Are you saying that less liquidity is deflationary, which is bullish for the market? On a very, very, short term basis, and in very small, imperceptible almost, quantities, that could be true. But since this is a market and economy fueled by the excess liquidity injected by the Fed since 1994, I posit that any attempt to slow it down runs the serious risk of accomplishing what the Japanese accomplished in 1989 when they tried to prick their bubble. We need more and more and more liquidity to keep the market rising. Any attempt to slow it down will be spotted by the people on and off Wall Street who watch those numbers closely. They will all attempt to get out at the same time if it's too obvious. But they will have been beaten to the door by those who don't have to guess at such matters. The confident small investor will initially (-10%?) consider it to be another buying opportunity. Chances are that won't last long, as it didn't, even in October. In spite of what was advertised the public was net sellers during that minor correction. Sorry if I misunderstood what you were saying. The positives you mention are certainly in the market at these levels. Earnings actually fell in the 4th quarter, and the outlook going forward could be even worse. Yet the market continues going up, with valuations at all time high levels. Something there doesn't quite seem right. But then it's not all that unprecedented. When the market used to be driven almost solely by interest rates, bull markets had a habit of ignoring rising interest rates for as much as 6 months before finally turning down. Don't get me wrong. No one knows when this will end, or how it will play out. There are many different models. We could see a correction of 20-25% that feels like a bear market but is short in duration. A race to the old (possibly higher) highs fueled in part by "we told you the market always goes back up", then a final top. But if I see a blowoff type move any time soon, I for one will be playing it for a least an initial 50% decline. Good luck, Dwight