Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KC Jones who wrote (2772)	3/28/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: S.S	Respond to of 6654

i would have to agree if a reverse split does accrue it will have to be around the .25 level...an as far as the MM goes they will have to shake harder than what they are doing because i got in at .01....500,000 shares so they can shake an shake an shake i know this stock is going to move...an when i said, june i did not mean news would come out then i just feel that is when the major move upward will accrue yes it will move on news before then but major move will accrue in june... enough said for me im heading down to murtle beach to play some golf good luck...an hang in there MM will drop this stock to around the low we seen friday .014 to shake the rest out...all i can say is dont be stupid an sale if you do you will be kicking yourself later....

To: KC Jones who wrote (2772)	3/28/1998 11:59:00 AM
From: Ray Palmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Hi everybody, I purchased my shares at .0205 and I most definitely will not be scared into selling under the current climate. In fact, I think that the prices we are seeing represent a good buying opportunity, in my opinion! I believe in what Mr. Arnold is trying to do and if his work pays off I will celebrate at some point by using my profits to pay off my credit cards! I think that a reverse split will not be needed at first. The company may give the market time to establish a fair value for our shares. That value may then dictate if a reverse split is needed and if so, what size the split would be. Just my thoughts... Regards, Ray Palmer