Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. M. Jones who wrote (3077)	3/28/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: proud dad	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4736

I spoke with him in Dec. of 96.He seemed very intelligent.He did believe in his product but didn't pump it. He didn't seem to like the business end of things,he is a technical person I believe. He believes it will prove itself in the end. As for the questions,they are good but I don't have answers.Call IR at UPR and ask about the Helium project.My guess is it hasn't been squelched. Maybe NAMX is looking for helium? Lastly,I can't call him he hasn't seemed to want to talk. I don't know his #. I still want to believe this is legit!

To: M. M. Jones who wrote (3077)	3/28/1998 4:40:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

MM, Why don't you call him if you have all those questions and don't rely on other people to do your work for you. I'm sick of people who say they are investor's here implying so much as being negative and trying to put the burden on the postitve share holders to prove they have a right to be positive. We can be postive if we want, it's our money. So shut up and do your own DD. The call you were involved with cap to Gruy were blown up exagerated negatives which turned out to be all not true and Gruy even denied telling cap anything like what he posted here. So who are you and what is your motive here. Call Paul yourself and post something that's true if you can, instead of your clever little negative spin you are doing here. Are you involved in the shorting scheme? If you have some negative info that is a fact that's different but so far you are no different than hunter, posting questions that are not answered yet and implying because they are not answered then something must be terribly wrong. I'm on to you.