Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (44448)	3/28/1998 3:49:00 PM
From: joseph krinsky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

hi Al, how are you, where have you been, havent talked to you in the longest. what have you been up to, i like what you posted. only a wish. will ride this out all the way till the fat lady sings, but i have to say, there are some of the nicest people i have ever met, right here on this tread. they are very special people to me, i have never met them, but i like them alot, they seem like a family to me and a big part of my life, i enjoy them, and only wish the best here, i really trust Gary and Roland, they will fix things up. i belive in them, things will happen, but it will not happen overnight, iam waiting for a news realease soon. comming. trading will start soon. we do have a very large short here. Rileys numbers are right, an Pugs does know what he is saying, it will happen very soon. joey.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (44448)	3/28/1998 4:14:00 PM
From: Arcane Lore	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

There are a few key differences between the shopping.com situation and what has been claimed by some for RMIL: (1) AFAIK there has been no claim that the shopping.com short selling was illegal. It does appear to have been naked. (2) A single entity (Waldron & Co.) apparently had and used the capability of bringing the short squeeze to fruition through buy-ins. Whether that entity ultimately profits from their strategy may well be decided by the courts. Here are some links for those interested in the shopping.com story: MSNBC articles about shopping.com and/or Waldron: msnbc.com msnbc.com msnbc.com msnbc.com The trading suspension giving as reason: "recent market activity in the stock that may have been the result of manipulative conduct": sec.gov For completeness, here is the link you provided plus a related chart: businessweek.com businessweek.com The Silicon Investor thread, #Subject-19749 (only 14 replies to date) may also be of interest, particularly #reply-3754350.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (44448)	3/28/1998 6:23:00 PM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

It is a shame that didnt happen with RMIL, but it does show the basic idea was correct. Short sellers CAN be made to buy back in at a much higher price. BTW..there is a link to a chart at the bottom of the article.

To: Just My Opinion who wrote (44448)	3/28/1998 8:06:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Respond to of 55532

Al-len, Since Shopping.com was halted on Mar. 24 and there already is a big ruckus surrounding the company (a BB stock as well) in just the past week, why is it that RMIL hasn't received similar publicity?? Things that make you go hmmm.... Thanks for posting that article. It might make a few people start to wonder why RMIL hasn't enjoyed a comparable surge in price given the HUGE amount of shares claimed to be short by its shareholders (and unofficially by the company as well??) Regards, Ron