Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Paramount Ventures & Finance -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: janci who wrote (605)	3/29/1998 9:28:00 AM
From: R.Goodman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4884

Thanks for your input.I think it's save to say this since the bre-X fiasco no person should rely on any one post here or elsewhere to make a decision to buy or sell.Every should make the effort to give information that to the best of their knowledge is accurate in a civil way.

To: janci who wrote (605)	3/29/1998 3:00:00 PM
From: Diamond Daze	Respond to of 4884

Good morning Janci...Thank you for your honesty on web educate I took it as screaming. By what you have posted it seems we are pretty much in sync. (You or) I did not by this stock for or because of Wawa we bought this stock for a sedimentary copper deposit and a low grade gold multi billion ton deposit, and a NW territory Diamond claims. None of these have been proven economic to date ( the Eureka was dropped ) None of the Argentine deals have been partnered with a Major, has occurred as far as I know.....and Indonesia... skip that for now. You stated that you would be contacting the Italians...( I was adopted by my step father ) I am Italian, so if you don't want emotion or passion don't call the Italians...... I too am awakened at night wondering if I made the right move in investing the majority of my wealth into PVF. I did not make the comment about thirty cents lightly...If you look at PVF chart it has been ia a decline for a long long time. Fundamentally it has a much greater chance of going to .30 cents now then it does to .80 cents...It has been a a solid decline with only one technical bounce. PVF needs a decisive turn around in it's share value, no if ..ands...or buts. It will only happen by a fundamental change in the markets prospective of PVF. So far that has not occurred...until it does occur .30 cents is more likely. We as stock holders , buying our positions at much higher costs must ponder the thoughts of " man I could own four or five times a much at these levels"..in which case you would have all the outstanding float and this wouldn't be an issue. Im not selling but 0__x________2.00___________4.00____________________20.00__________ ..... worry,.......cost,....happy,....extremely happy,... cartwheels...mind blower....... I think I know what the company desires are too. Again if we were there on any point the markets prospective would change..there would be a swell of buyers including our market maker ( referred to as Saint John of Jones Gable in previous posts )...and a decisive turn in PVF price performance. To close that is the sad truth of the matter, this is not the Gospel according to Chris, this is a place where people discuss and ponder their future and guess and deduce where the company's going . Some may have more risk than others , percentage wise and future wise. We have been patient...we need a fundamental change now...At 2.00 I will sleep much better. Still to ponder the fact of risk reward , a investment of 500k in the DOW 4-5 years ago would be nearly tripled with a lot less risk. Then a person could buy not 3 times more but almost 15 times more PVF at these levels today. That's a lot to think about and a lot to take in. So if I get excited it is truly because I am worried and wondering if I made the right investment decision for me and my family......Chris

To: janci who wrote (605)	3/29/1998 4:33:00 PM
From: Diamond Daze	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4884

Sorry , I left some thing out..If we were such a screaming deal.. and all these Majors wants us , they could take out the majority of the stock for a little over 5 million dollars U.S. Neither Paul or Jones Gable combined hold more than what 9 million shares ?? Add yours to that and several other large holders, might bump it up to 12 - 13 million ......what would it take? They could do that and just for 1/2 the treasury no ?? Come on now Janci...educate us..I would really like to know... Cheers