Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gerald Walls who wrote (31295)	3/29/1998 10:30:00 AM
From: Anne Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

well Jay is certainly outspoken..everytime he says something controversial..he gets labled as having bad motives..he wasnt too far off on Naxos..which was really based on his opinion of the Johns..and that saga is being fought now..when it was rumored that Jay was changing his attitude toward naxos..even in the face of high assays..he stood his ground..theres no secret here that Jay was a big fan of Le Furlong..i'm sure he was dissapointed to see him go.. frankly..tho i sometimes dont agree with Jay..I think he has guts. he writes what he truly thinks..how he is percieved has more to do with the individuals position in the stock than an acceptance of his views..he becomes easy fodder for the perpetual slammers and the chronic disgruntled.. as to his view of IPM's future..Jay always tied its success to the people who were involved..that he doesnt like the direction of the new board at this time certainly gives him the option of not being as bullish as before..i think the next 2 years in the desert gold stocks will be quite interesting..and at least for the next year..the actual production of a pure ounce of gold will have little to do with the stock price..