Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : BAAT - world records for electric vehicles with zinc-air -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (3076)	3/29/1998 11:08:00 AM
From: don roberson	Respond to of 6464

Suggest you take the "Stock Detective" with a grain of salt also. Wait to see the Kiplinger report. You know nothing about the "background " of the Stock Detective, but you seem to take is as Gospel. CAUTION.

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (3076)	3/29/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Wes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6464

I want to thank everyone who contributes to this thread, pro or con, regarding BAAT. I've learned and am learning a great deal about investing and the Internet, not just about BAAT. Thanks again.

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (3076)	3/29/1998 1:24:00 PM
From: Gregory J. Sova	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6464

Why BAAT should sue Stock Detective The velocity of news is sweeping away individual rights it seems to me. Thus, the dark side of the internet looms large as yet another social experiment heads toward some unknown end. Where is accountability in anything anymore? The reputation bashing words used in SD's Feb., 7 piece ought to be challenged by BAAT in a court of law. I would be in favor of a class action law suit by BAAT stockholders of record who suffered damages to be a part of any legal action. SD suggests something funny is going on and leaves you with a long Hmmmmmm. That is substance? And SD blatantly says BAAT is long on wind and short on substance!! They cite BAAT press releases touting 92mpg and refer to this as company lore!!! Substance is 93.2mpg - proven. Any apology from SD to it readers? The internet is killing small companies with what it is spewing out. Some is good but there is an awful lot bad!! Bashing, shredding peoples lives and fortunes - seems to have found its way all the way from the White House to the internet overnight. Or is it because the moral compass in this country is indeed already lost on a national scale and greed not substance is the new commerce of the land!

To: Kimberly Lee who wrote (3076)	3/29/1998 2:23:00 PM
From: BrainPlastic	Respond to of 6464

Yet, clearly Kimberly you have not seen the piece. It is perfectly fine for them to use BAAT as an example becasue we had that 3 dollar run, but Kiplinger may have also given the positives on this stock such as "now things have calmed down, the SEC has not founhd anything wrong with BAAT, etc. etc.". Your comment is based strictly on Stockdetective? Maybe you should work with Starr...