SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tonto who wrote (44471)3/29/1998 12:09:00 PM
From: Pugs  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
Tonto,
The investor is contractually bound, his 'option' is to come thru by the months end, or not.
As far as my fantasy, you evaded all discission, OPEN DISCUSSION, that you bid for, concerning the illegal shortsellers and their 'work' on RMIL & AZNT.
It may not be relevant to you, but it sure is to Mork, isn't it? Thats why he's supeona-ing shareholders, isn't it?, that why he hired Baker, isn't it? Mork is aware the float is in certificate form, and I'm sure you are too. So, who are you kidding with your self-serving crap Tonto?
You evade these questions as not to incriminate yourself (.)!!! Your BS persona of nobility is laughable, you apparently work on behalf of shortsellers and RMIL shareholders know we have the float in certificate form whether the investor lives up to letter of intent or not. We have a squeeze regardless. Our concern is what is left after the float.
We do know one thing, you'll be long gone, you're neede on NETZ, etc., aren't you?
Pugs



To: tonto who wrote (44471)3/29/1998 12:11:00 PM
From: Riley G  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
At 10:36 AM 3/29/98 EST, you wrote:
>Riley, my buddy Pete called in 1000 more shares in name. E-
>trade was giving him a hard time because RMIL wasn't trading, he pressured
>them, threatened them and they finally relented!!
>
>Pugs
>SOLIDARITY!!!!

______________________________________________________________________
Pugs,
I would say that brokers that claim this know that RMIL shares are in SHORT demand, and being forced to cover when the stock is not trading (awaiting OTC compliance approval) would be their worst nightmare! This means they would have to force MM's to make a market in the stock, but if GM keeps the market closed after OTC compliance approval, then that should prove interesting. I only wish that everyone would be as persistent as your friend, as approx. 400k that I dropped off of the list last month would apply tons more forward pressure on the shorts to cover, but I guess that I'm just blowing smoke!

Remember that RMIL (OVIS) went to $4 without any RMCW deal, and was walked down by the MM's and the few that sold off their shares. Also remember that we as a group of VERIFIED certificate and unverified shareholders own an estimated 1 million over the legal float alone, and this is missing some 200-250 other shareholders!

I say, stay strong and get on the brokerage firms backsides for those remaining certificates! It all comes down to everyone of us shareholders applying the pressure on the illegal shorts with or without RMCW, Palco, etc!

Riley G



To: tonto who wrote (44471)3/29/1998 12:49:00 PM
From: Ellen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
>> The investors are considering options right now, instead of continuing to be disruptive, it would be in the best interest of the group to become productive and allow a better atmosphere for open discussion amongst the shareholders. Good luck. <<

Are you insinuating that you are privy to what investors (shareholders?) may or may not be doing or considering?

Not a flame, just a simple question.