SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : THNK -- Think New Idea -- Rolls Royce of Web Page Creators -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Sman who wrote (109)3/29/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: TERRY MURPHY  Respond to of 545
 
I totally agree. While pumping up stocks without solid fundamentals is clearly morally reprehensible, there is nothing wrong with sharing opinions about companies that truly seem to have bringht prospects such as THNK. I would also argue that Micny's points are totally ludicrous as they pertain to THNK for the following reason: the volume in THNK in $ terms over the last 2 weeks clearly shows that institutions are getting into the stock. Even if someone wanted to "hype" the stock, as Micny puts it, it would be impossible given that big players are now involved. This is like saying that a group of small investors could push up Microsoft. So Micny, why don't you go to the MSFT thread and make your inane claims over there where people can get a good belly laugh. Maybe your intentions are good but the extent to which you are trying to debase THNK as a real company with solid fundamentals leads me to believe you may have a financial interest in seeing the stock go down.

Once again, everyone is responsible for doing his/her own due dilligence. I have done mine and believe THNK to be an extremely attractive growth stock.

I believe the majority of rational investors see things from this point of view.....Terry



To: Jack Sman who wrote (109)3/29/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: micny  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 545
 
Seems like excessive protesting. If you're not inclined to look over,or you're already familiar with these previous post, just pass them, and mine, over. Others, who may be inclined can refer back if they want to.

Nothing has been said to discredit the stock. I don't own it nor have I shorted it. I just see interesting posting patterns, different names, but similar patterns generally relating to thinly traded issues. I'm sure you've noticed, haven't you?