Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (13683)	3/29/1998 8:52:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Frank, You bring up an interesting point which I assume has been addressed elsewhere. Since Tim is the first mmkr I have seen openly represent himself as such, I will address the following to him personally: Tim, if you read this, I was wondering if your firm makes a market in TAVA or if not, maybe you could suggest some sources of information regarding exactly how mmkrs operate in making a market. I don't expect you to reveal all your secrets, but a more in-depth understanding of Nasdaq market making activitites is definitely something that is lacking in references. Regards, Ron

To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (13683)	3/30/1998 4:07:00 AM
From: Mr Logic	Respond to of 31646

DocStone, >>Actually Patrick, there WAS a monster buyer...<< An anonymous person using the internet and claiming such is far, far from unique and I suggest that you should treat such posts, however convincing, with extreme caution. You may not like it but that is 100% sincere advice. I have read many of the 'Tim Flick' posts, from the start. You know what, I just had six replies to my message. How many considered the point I was making, why logically we should have seen more business to TAVA by this stage? None. If I think something is a good idea I want to talk with people who disagree. OK, maybe some think it is such a poor point that it is not worth responding to. But it makes a lot of sense to me. I would like to see the other side of the argument, but maybe I am right.