Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (11256)	3/29/1998 8:55:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 20681

Sort of an out of the frying pan into the bonfire situation?? JLA

To: Henry Volquardsen who wrote (11256)	3/30/1998 8:27:00 AM
From: jlallen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Henry: I'm all for relocating Naxos headquarters and incorporation to the USA. I have posted that on several occasions. However, it seems to me that California is the wrong location. Why does not Nevada or a mining friendly state make more sense? Better yet why not incorporate the operation in Delaware or some other corp./business friendly state and register the company in Nevada? Obviously one has to consider taxes, etc. but I would be willing to bet a bundle that franchise taxes, corp. taxes, etc. are much better in Nevada than in California. I realize that a large portion of Nevada may be rural and may not have the infrastructure you'd like to see but that would not apply to Las Vegas or Reno. Either of those would make a good choice. I read an article in Forbes about all the businesses which were bailing out of Calif. to go to Nevada over tax issues, over regulation and environmental concerns. I can't see how Naxos would not be in the same situation. A mining company in California? What are your thoughts?