Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rob L. who wrote (13728)	3/30/1998 11:00:00 AM
From: Josef Svejk	Respond to of 31646

Humble suggestion, All, time to read #reply-2298989 again. Svejk (GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-)

To: Rob L. who wrote (13728)	3/30/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: eric deaver	Respond to of 31646

Rob, Now I have been on this thread a long time. Go back and read your post. First you said that there is not enough discussion of TAVA (its like a chat line) on the thread and then you tell people not to discuss the fundamentals of TAVA because they are on the research thread. Give the newbies a break and lets reiterate our position over and over again. It serves a useful purpose in that it reinforces for everyone the fundamentals of this company and lets us keep a focus on why we bought and should continue to hold. Heck, maybe we may want to purchase some more after we review that material. Just my thoughts - no offense intended. Eric

To: Rob L. who wrote (13728)	3/30/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk	Respond to of 31646

Humbly report, Rob, after re-reading the post I am responding to, I thought I'd go back and revisit your earliest posts regarding TAVA (TPRO in those days). I humbly suggest you do the same. Here is a good start. Feel free to click on each and every one of your posts listed: techstocks.com Times have changed, names have changed, tickers have changed, your take on TAVA has changed, but some things remain the same. 'Nuff said . . . All the best, Svejk (GL-15 applies: digiserve.com ;-)

To: Rob L. who wrote (13728)	3/30/1998 12:44:00 PM
From: S.C. Barnard	Respond to of 31646

Rob, take a STRANGER'S word for it, even- this is NO CHATLINE! and I have seen SI chatlines.

To: Rob L. who wrote (13728)	3/30/1998 4:08:00 PM
From: Quad Sevens	Respond to of 31646

<<< all the needless insecure chatter going on >>> LOL Rob L. You were the worst offender at one time, whining about every little downtick back in the Fall, asking a zillion stupid questions that had already been answered. Cheryl even called you a short! Now you come here to lecture the board ... I agree with what you said (the board is getting silly again with incessant chatter), but coming from you .... with no sense of apology ... well ...... ahem .... gasp ... I'm choking from the hypocrisy, help!... cough ... sputter ... rasp ... Wade

To: Rob L. who wrote (13728)	3/30/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: B.Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

Well Rob L. bad hair day? Cool out man. You are going to get traders on the thread whether you like it or not. I always try to keep my post's brief, that way I at least won't be an over-winded fool. By the way, had you purchased 4000 shrs. with me at the bottom 12 1/4 you also would be up $9,000.00. I have a core position but trading a stock you love to own is really fun. Cool it with the negative waves you'll get your yin-yang, karma, profit-lose etc. out of whack. Cordially, B.Long