SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Russ who wrote (10441)3/30/1998 10:53:00 AM
From: Alomex  Respond to of 213177
 
You're wrong on that, and if you don't care enough to look it up (ie, get your facts straight), you shouldn't post.

Thanks Russ.



To: Russ who wrote (10441)3/30/1998 10:59:00 AM
From: VicAppl  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
If I was wrong about the date, then I apologize to Alomex and to anyone else I may have offended by that comment.

However, I wrote a great deal more in the several posts we exhanged and, as far as I know, this was the one inaccuracy they contained. He answered none of the others.

The point actually was, not when he changed his position to neutral, but rather what the heck a neutral position could have done for anyone as investors.

Again, this is selective quoting.

This is my last post of the day, as I won't be able to respond any longer. The fact is, that I suppose I'll go back to lurking mode. You obviously enjoy this ongoing and irrelevant diatribe and I'd be the last person to get in the way of that.

Good investing everyone.

Vic.



To: Russ who wrote (10441)3/30/1998 11:01:00 AM
From: Phillip C. Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
Russ,

It is hard to believe Alomex's "nuetral" as
he predicted Q2 will be in red. There is no street's analyst who
would say Q2 will be in red. How can a person have such a negative
view with "neutral" rating. I don't know what he bases on to say
"nuertal" rather than "sell".

Phil