Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (5071)	3/30/1998 11:22:00 AM
From: tahoeman	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

If it's in an SEC filing, then the company needs to support the statement, or answer to the SEC and investors....that goes for all publicly traded companies.

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (5071)	3/30/1998 11:23:00 AM
From: Jon Tara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Actually, ESVS shouldn't have to explain anything to anyone if the data turns out not to be happening. Nor would NETZ. ESVS made a tentative deal with NETZ, contingent on their producing the audited financial statements by a certain date. No financial statements, no deal. No explaining need to anybody. Same thing for NETZ, as their isn't any penalty, other than the deal not going through. Everybody just walks away. It appears that nobody will be in trouble with the SEC or anybody else if the audited statements do not materialize. Just no deal.