To: Hawkmoon who wrote (9039 ) 3/30/1998 9:05:00 PM From: Ferick Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13091
Ron: To: NedPenguin From: Ron Reece Sunday, Mar 29 1998 7:48PM EST >>>..............And Ned, you know damn well that a "promoter" doesn't put his own capital at risk to such an extent as I have as an individual investor in GRNO.....<<< Didn't Bo put up his own capital? Didn't he promote GRNO stock? >>>.............I was not a promoter. I was an activist shareholder.............<<< Didn't Richard Nixon say something similar to this? To: NedPenguin (9022 ) From: Ron Reece Sunday, Mar 29 1998 9:50PM EST Reply # of 9039 >>>...But Ned, you said that you knew everything from your little source.<<< It's all right here on this board (my little source). >>>And you are absolutely being ludicrous with your issues of taxation.<<< Tell it to the I.R.S. >>>I guess if someone insists on buying your lunch out of gracious hospitality, that then puts you square in his/her pocket?? Do you report that to the IRS when you go out for your power lunches? Are you so easily manipulated by the promise of a free meal that you naturally assume others are as well?? . STOP WINKING AT ME!!! >>>Jeezus you're quite a comedian. The only thing I am guilty of is being an activist shareholder with a strong desire to see the company succeed and get its story out. I did too much and stuck my neck out too far. Never again. But that certainly isn't a crime. <<< Tell it to the judge. >>>I bought all of our 5 figure stock position with personal funds and I there is no way that wining and dining me convinced me or my wife to do that. Would a "compensated" promoter do that?? If so, then I want my money back...:0) And since you know so much, you know that our position was far more costly than the price of a couple of dinners.<<< You really don't get it. You don't pay to promote, you get paid to promote. Fax machines and plane tickets will count as compensation. And stop it with that Monica Lewinsky grin you keep tossing in along with that wink. It's only helping to reinforce my personal opinion of you. Does your "wife" know? >>>Any intelligent individual (don't waste your time looking in the mirror) knows that I'm irrelevant to GRNO now. Only the company, its management, and the commercial viability of its technology are pertinent.<<< When were you ever relevant to GRNO? Actually, I'm honored that you find me so integral to your scenario. Are you still suggesting that GRNO is a utter and complete scam?? When did I ever suggest that GRNO is "a (an) utter and complete scam? This statement is one of many libelous accusations you have made against me personally. You inaccurately paraphrase what I have said . >>>If not, then just what are you saying Ned?? What's your ultimate point with this discussion??<<< Ron: I wasn't speaking with you. I responded to a post by Charles King and a response to my post was offered by Bob Brooke and then, I responded to his post (stay with me on this). It was then that you jumped in offering your knowledge of the legal system and how it applies to stockholder lists. It was at that time (but not the first time) you began paraphrasing what I had said in a negative light. You have offered no foundation to your accusations. >>>Geezus Ned... If I have to explain plain English then I'll be assessing you a tutoring fee.... <<< (Still a legend in his own mind) >>>I only referred to another shareholder's impression who had not had the opportunity to meet BC or visit the company before (something which you still have yet to do... :0)<<< There you go again with that Monica smile and that annoying little wink. You might like it in prison. But, you'll have to cut back on the twinkies. Ned