SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : IFMX - Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jeff Meredith who wrote (10110)3/30/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: harryl1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14631
 
tagline vote: I like it. with a two minute, "elevator ride" story about extensibility, maximum performance, and a 'best of both worlds' oo/rdbms implementation, this could work well as both positioning and frame for the benefit discussion. ordbms and rdbms are too well established / mature for simple faster / cheaper / better positioning. Here "future" can be web, e-commerce, datawarehouse, enterprise replication and scaling -- whatever YOU think the future is (except maybe network computing... ).

I respect @jim's opinions, but this is gonna work way better than "think different". :-) (yea, yea, aapl stock is up... for now...)



To: Jeff Meredith who wrote (10110)3/31/1998 4:20:00 AM
From: MJ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14631
 
>i believe oracle will jettison CORBA for data cartridges and a
>have a more datablade-like architecture. they will dynamically
>load extensions written in c/c++ into the running DBMS -- or be
>destroyed w.r.t. performance. i.e. they will subscribe to the
>"madness".

Agree. I have already seen Oracle marketing material referring to data cartridges as being able to 'snap-in' to the database.

Oracle's approach is too S-L-O-W to survive. I have heard (ok, from an Informix employee) that in a recent head to head (which Informix won), Oracle couldn't provide a single reference for their data cartridge stuff.

-M