Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (9411)	3/30/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: Laz	Respond to of 27968

How... would be the next logical question. Laz

To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (9411)	3/30/1998 10:32:00 PM
From: Dusty Vestal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Hmm, so the question now arises, who then is INTHEFLESH? I wonder if the web mistress should be notified about this... Impersonating someone is a no no..... Jonathan, are you 100% sure about this? Dusty

To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (9411)	3/30/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: Little Engine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Jon, Please ask "the real Ira," who I presume you talked to online, just like the other day <g> the following: 1) How did "Flesh" manage to know not only that Ira was not going on the stock promotion cruise, but also sending someone in his place? 2) Why did Ira previously, when given a chance to deny it via e-mail, instead hint that he actually was "Flesh"? 3) Why didn't Ira, once he knew of "INTHEFLESH" a week ago, ask SI to cancel this person's account? (He could have done that with a simple e-mail, as well). 4) Who would spend $125 on an account to pose as Ira... an account that could be canceled so easily in a single day? Why not just do it via a trial account? Much easier and cheaper, I would think... "INTHEFLESH" is unfortunately Ira, warts and all.... though I can see why he would want to deny it after the response from shareholders who want a sentient being at the helm. L.E.

To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (9411)	3/30/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: Wclegg	Respond to of 27968

Do you really think IRA would tell you if he was INTHEFLESH? I don't think so! Bill

To: Jonathan Lebed who wrote (9411)	3/31/1998 9:16:00 AM
From: Jane4IceCream	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Jonathan said "INTHEFLESH is NOT Ira..." And PWSP is a SHAM! And TokyoMex in the chatroom the other nite was REALLY Jonathan Lebed! Who is calling who?? SI has caught onto your illegal PWSP recommendations by now and future recommendations like LTGL will go nowhere (certainly not too$1..LOL) because you can only lead sheep to the edge of the cliff. Jane getting a REALLY good laugh this morning!