Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bmart who wrote (44580)	3/31/1998 9:51:00 AM
From: Mr. Dendro	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 55532

Interesting post, but frankly I find it hard to believe since it sounds like a rehash of previous posts by Riley and Pugs. If they are your source then it's hard to attach credibility to your conclusions. Can you post more specific information, such as other stocks where Mork and Zapara pulled the "little game" alleged in your post? Can you post the name of the Canadian brokerage firm that comes within Mork's corporate umbrella? Can you post any facts proving a relation between Tonto, Kugler, and Mork? If you're uncomfortable posting your evidence, feel free to send me a private message. Regards, D.

To: bmart who wrote (44580)	3/31/1998 11:21:00 AM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

Riley, Our big problem right now is that the natives are getting restless. Over and over I've seen shareholders stay optimistic for a long time, and then get discouraged before they reach the finish line. It's virtually a rule of investing. I'm more encouraged than I have been for a few months. It seems to me that the puzzle is beginning to unwind. The puzzle being, of course, how this stock has behaved so strangely in every way for so long, and has come to be the virtual epic that it is. Who is who, what are they doing, how did the stock get shorted, halted and abused. It seems a foregone conclusion that RMIL can trade whenever they want. Even the nays admit that now, and anyone who doubts it can call the SEC. This is vitally important. Why would RMIL not trade even though they could? What could possibly make them resist the pressure to trade? The answer is pretty simple: They are waiting for something. It is very comforting to know that the company is actually making a command decision - the difference between CAN'T TRADE and WON'T TRADE is a huge signal to investors. Can't trade is passive - Won't trade is active, and demonstrates strength on the part of management. Detective work by others on the thread regarding the Mork-Baker-Zapara connection is really some of the best news I've heard. A little short in the states, and a lot short in Canada. Essentially reports of a Mork controlled company off-shore provides the missing link for everyone who was wondering where all the shorts got off to. Imagine those guys making this company tanking trick work over and over, and then running up against a band of dedicated shareholders. Man they must be hating life. I admit I get a little discouraged when I see people getting sucked into the nay trap. I'll admit that the nays seem plausible at times. It takes a lot of time and dedication though for the investor to weigh ALL of the information and construct the big picture. Most people simply don't have the time and energy. I believe that most people who have been here the whole time and read the thousands and thousands of posts have seen through the nay screen of subtle inconsistencies and unanswered questions. I sure hope so anyway.