Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Y2K (Year 2000) Stocks: An Investment Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Eddy who wrote (10535)	3/31/1998 1:45:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13949

OK, now you force me to recount details from memory (gg). I think the deal was that when ML assessed their progress over two years using PTUS' tools they realized they were way behind schedule. They then brought in... I think... CCD On-line. Yes, it may have been foot dragging more so than PTUS' tool being bad. Actually, I've never heard that PTUS had a bad tool, only that it was hard to use and relatively inflexible. But this, if true (and I'll confirm it tomorrow), would be further evidence why outsourcing Y2K to a reputable vendor is the best way to go, IMO. - Jeff