Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (11338)	3/31/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: mfgrep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Tom-- My experience is that the underachiever always goes for the less attractive female companion. The thought behind this is that these lowly individuals cannot face more rejection than they have already faced in the past. Their chances of being rejected by the sweet, cute, country girl is lessened significantly in comparison to the rejection rate from the glamorous, sequin adorned, city girl with bulbous round hollywood breasts. As for me.....I am a Naxos investor.....give me the bulbous breasts.....I can handle it. Shaggin' Baby, Jason P.S. Mary Ann would never cheat on you.....Ginger is spreadin' that stuff around to all the Graffitti guys. You mess with Mary Ann.....you are in for life......Ginger on the other hand.....just a heck of a fling. Oh yeah....and as far as waking up in the morning next to her with the makeup stained pillow....well....I'd be halfway through my short stack at IHOP by then. You guys are gettin' old.

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (11338)	3/31/1998 12:10:00 PM
From: HalNeedham	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

To:All I have been a lurker for the past 12 months less 2 when I had no access to SI. I am long on Naxos and believe I believe I will be that way for quite a while. My E-mail etc. is listed with SI. I have been retired for 10 years. This thread has given me a reasonably broad understanding of the NAXOS situation, perceived opportunities and risks, and some insite into the personalities that post regularly. Thank you all for these things. My question involves something that I have obviously missed on this thread and is as follows: NAXOS has gold reports that are mostly in the .2 range. They are just now getting into an expanded drilling program, have yet to set up a pilot production plant which may be of dubious value when completed, are in the midst of a management shakeup and reorganization, and stock selling presently in the 4's. MAXAM Gold, on the other hand has done considerable drilling, reporting gold in the .2++, has an apparently suitable pilot program ready to use, a stable management which seems to know what they are doing, a stock price that is less that $1, and a method they are happy with to recover the gold commercially. They are both DDs. Why the discrepancy in price???? What has NAXOS got going for it that makes it many times more valuable???? Hello to all. Hal