Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mel Spivak who wrote (1724)	3/31/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: m rosen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2383

1) tomorrow I will be stepping up for more stock 2) the writing is on the wall, when determining the scope of a patent with a very narrow application, judge jones would not require six months of deliberation, rather a broader scope would require the research into each defendant's infringement and which defendant's will be dismissed or included in a potential markman hearing, this judge is known for running an efficient courtroom and fair but expedited decisions; IF THIS WAS GOING TO BE A NARROW INTERPRETATION OF THE PATENT THIS DECISION WOULD HAVE BEEN MADE MONTHS AGO!!! I have researched many Jones cases and her pattern of decision making and timing of her docket entries, you have very little time to buy this stock under $1. 3)Other investors are in their buying stock it has not just been me. 4) Let's get ready to rumble !!!