SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : CAWS - Wireless Cable (New and Improved) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zorro who wrote (4892)4/1/1998 1:17:00 AM
From: Fowler1  Respond to of 5812
 
Whats up at CAWS? Do they still have an office? I sure would like to here some encouraging words!



To: Zorro who wrote (4892)4/1/1998 9:08:00 AM
From: WTC  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 5812
 
This seems to be a new spectrum tune that makes no sense to me:
<"It really doesn't make any sense ... to use [LMDS spectrum] for video," Hardin said, because the "cell structures are too small." In other words, the spectrum isn't expansive enough to deliver a video signal. Instead, the top bidders likely will use their spectrum for "telephony or data, as a base business. Video needs a fair amount of bandwidth," he said - more than the 150 MHz to 1150 MHz in the LMDS spectrum. > More than 1150MHz??!! DirecTV has 500MHz x 2 polarizations, and they use the same QPSK modulation that seems the modulation of choice for optimum utilization of 28GHz (Nortel/BNI is the only exception I am aware of, with a QAM design.) I think there are 4, maybe 5 cable systems in the country with more than 750MHz. You have to wonder what he is thinking if 1150MHz isn't enough for a full service network capability with video, data, and voice capacity. That does not mean that it is prudent or economic to bundle those services on an LMDS platform, or even that it makes economic sense to deliver consumer multichannel video. But to explain video away as too much of a spectrum hog for LMDS, well, please.