SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : MRV Communications (MRVC) opinions? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: V who wrote (7985)3/31/1998 6:07:00 PM
From: Saul Feinberg Jr.  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 42804
 
Given the current complexity that is involved
in building LAN/WANS and what have you, i dont
think that the commoditizing of switches is imminent, as
suggested by people who liken this market to
the NIC cards and the network adapter cards.

It is true that valuing a networking company will
always be much, much more difficult than say a
McDonald's. I have to think that just as book-value
is used to evaluate traditional companies, intellectual
capital should be used to evaluate hi-tech companies.
Surely the intellectual capital at Microsoft is worth
some amount of money. I mean the amount of time/dollars
you spend recruiting and coming up with the group of
people who have IQs and work for a common goal surely
cannot be worth zero in the balance sheet, (although it
is by GAAP standards). Given this, I'd say that MRV's
intellectual capital is high up there, because they
recruit a lot of people from CalTech, and they have
a very low turnover rate of engineers. And although
I am not Jewish, I really think the Jewish people are
really, really smart. And MRV is run by smart, Jewish
people.

It is also true that competition from the big boys will
only hurt and not help. But with all the stuff that
needs to be done (e.g. fiber-optic connections for
new neighborhoods, gigabit ethernet), some of which
have not been standardized, I think the future for
MRV is not as bleak as the current market valuation
seems to suggest.

The question we have to ask ourselves is this: If someone
gives you $650 Million to compete with MRV, would
you take the offer? If the answer is yes, then MRV
is overvalued, if the answer is no, then obviously
MRV is undervalued, since $650M is the current market
cap.

Now suppose you start a networking company and run it as
frugally as MRV and hire a bunch of PhDs from MIT then
you might have a chance to compete with MRV. I wish
someone all the luck to do it, but as for me, I would
just buy MRV shares on the open market, be a cheerleader,
and get out of the way ...



To: V who wrote (7985)3/31/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: J. Conley  Respond to of 42804
 
V,

The first paragraph of my post was from the GEAR sell rec. posted on this board by Greg. My intent was to respond to GEAR's statement set forth in the first paragraph.

I then posted the gross margins (COGS divided by net sales) because I do not see the "decline" that GEAR refers to in their sell rec.

All said, my post clearly lacks clarity.

jc