Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Linda Kaplan who wrote (3242)	3/31/1998 7:18:00 PM
From: Dauntless	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7041

Linda, No problem, but I sincerely wish that you'd apply your training in an equal fashion. I think it's fair to say that you're on the short side of this stock - at least philosophically - but you're also civil. So I wonder why you've never been offended by the ceaseless ranting, insults, lies, etc. that spew from others - OK, Wexler. This behavior is just as obnoxious to me as Myron's is to you. In the last month or we've had periods of a few days where there was some good natured "combat" between the longs & the shorts. I'm sure you noticed that Wexler was absent during those periods and, as soon as he & his bile returned, things turned ugly - just the way he likes it. Maybe Myron's right, this neighborhood's too slimy with Bill here. The company has taken some hits but has endured (& even recovered) to the point where the REAL news should be sufficient to overpower the lies. Maybe we should all go away and leave this place to Bill, Steve, Hank, etc. - they can just support each other's lies and create their own little reality. They hang out on "Roger's short picks" and Bill has even started his own thread - "Profits of Doom" - what a way to go through life - looking for weak & failing companies. Now, since Asensio's first pack of lies in Nov., Bill and a varying cast of adoring fans has turned this thread into a place where discussion can only occur when he's not around. On every company thread where he performs his dark act, he is reviled. It is not enough to simply argue his views, he seems compelled to antagonize the thread to distraction. Even if he was always right (which he isn't) I have to wonder what sort of individual enjoys that role as thoroughly as he does?? I thought for a while that he was just trying spread lies to influence the stock but he ALWAYS gets personal - the CEO is a filthy crook, etc. - why not just a poor manager? I honestly think he enjoys the hatred - I'm not trained as you are but IMHO, THAT'S SICK. Bill, don't bother with your expected response - I'm not ready to leave this thread but I will never read, nor respond to another of your hateful posts.