Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Murrelpr who wrote (1634)	3/31/1998 7:26:00 PM
From: Dean Fontana	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Guy we the humble invester greatly appreciate the teamwork GE management and your PR firm has shown, keep it comming. This information will help ease some of the sceptiscm of my investors. Terry if you are reading, safe travels. Still at the TOP!!! Dino

To: Murrelpr who wrote (1634)	3/31/1998 8:01:00 PM
From: Jay Z.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Guy, Thanks for the Information. Finally some news we can rely on. Keep it coming. We appreciate your input and reliable information. Jay Z.

To: Murrelpr who wrote (1634)	3/31/1998 10:05:00 PM
From: Michel Grenier	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Good evening, Guy. You said: "Mr. Paravicini also had his team go back to the site as he was unsatisfied with the sampling distance (too far) in three areas. Although hampered by the rain, they did some infill trenching and channeling in those areas. The distance issue pertained to meeting proven reserve criteria. GE could have issued an incomplete report but chose to go for the entire report. The report will include proven and probable reserves. Also, inferred resources will be moved up to indicated, and indicated up to measured resources." That corresponds to the scenario I had in mind. They had to do further sampling so that the report could contain some proven reserves estimates and they chose to add the results from those last samples, rather than releasing a report based on results that would have been unconclusive. Well, thanks again for the information. It is truly appreciated. Michel

To: Murrelpr who wrote (1634)	3/31/1998 11:24:00 PM
From: rjbac	Respond to of 34075

Guy, Thank-you very much for the timely update. I am sure everyone on this thread appreciates you taking time from your busy schedule to keep us informed. Please tell Terry the same. Hope those results are great. Bac

To: Murrelpr who wrote (1634)	3/31/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Probart	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Guy, Baie dankie vir jou tyd end moeite, ons is baie dankbaar. Groete, Probart

To: Murrelpr who wrote (1634)	5/7/1998 10:29:00 AM
From: Ray Emery	Respond to of 34075

Guy, Are you still here? Any comments? The last time we heard from you was late March, and you had somewhat of a general time line for the report and the 10K. We have seen neither. Can you understand why there would be frustration and cynicism? Any input would be appreciated. Thanx, Ray Emery

To: Murrelpr who wrote (1634)	5/8/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: Jon Matz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Goodmorning Guy, on March 31st you wrote "Mr. Turner is in route to Bolivia to help finish the report and work on production start-up. The financing details will be available in a 10-K in about 2 weeks." Is he back? What's he doing? What's the status of the 10-K? And on another note, what is the status of the Moody's listing and will MINE request a trading halt prior to the reserve release? Could you please try to convince Mr. Turner to stop wasting our time by setting a definitive release date, even if that means they may have to hold the report a few days? I've just about worn out the "refresh button" on my browser, my eyes ache for a stroll outside in the sunshine and my butt is screaming to get off it! Signed; An ungrateful participant in MINE's continuing incompetence, Jon