Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (1523)	3/31/1998 11:28:00 PM
From: Wahoograd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11417

Thanks for information on the articles about Wave. One major development since the 1995 Byte Magazine article was written - the WaveMeter is now very competitive at $2 to $3 apiece in volume production. It's almost a "no brainer" for those OEMs who are considering installation.

To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (1523)	4/1/1998 12:13:00 AM
From: Marty Lee	Respond to of 11417

Dear M.F.G. We all do commerce by either withdrawing from our own accounts or borrowing from others. (the latter the less ideal) There's no reason the Wave Meter cannot facilitate both methods... Sincerely, Marty

To: M. Frank Greiffenstein who wrote (1523)	4/2/1998 1:38:00 AM
From: Pure Folder	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 11417

DocStone and Wahoograd, couple issues to discuss if you have time. DocStone: Thanks for the articles recently. The Dyson article cites a recent article by Mark Stefik, who authored a paper entitled "Trusted Systems," published in Scientific American, March 1997. A reprint of this article was included in the investor package I have for WAVX. Stefik mentions Wave Systems technology as a potential solution to the problem of not only getting paid, but monitoring usage and protecting copyright. If I recall correctly, the wavemeter not only bills users, but it keeps close track of who they are and what they use. This could be a dandy piece of circumstantial evidence if the writer of sophisticated software or other content thought its copyright was being infringed by someone. This is more likely to be of concern in the business, than consumer, context. For example, I once invested in a company that developed and licensed extremely sophisticated software used in pharmaceutical research (MDL Information Systems). Sure, Merck would spend millions to buy the whole system (and did), but what about the little guy who only needs a piece of the program for a brief period of time? He/she buys by the meter. This whole area may be one of the business-to-business applications now being explored by Allen's group, particularly as cable modems make the transfer of digital information so much quicker. Your thoughts? Wahoograd: Post 549 on the Yahoo Board claims a reliable source has it that Allen was given a generous severance package, but nevertheless was nudged out the IBM door. I'm skeptical. First, as someone over there observed, I doubt WAVX would sign up someone IBM did not like (that, by the way, was NOT given as the reason for the nudge), and I doubt WAVX would be entirely in the dark given the close relationship now between the companies. Second, the fact Allen chose WAVX ahead of everyone else is itself significant, regardless of why he left. Third, is this information questionable based upon what you know? Thanks. Pure Folder