SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : BORL: Time to BUY! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kashish King who wrote (9675)3/31/1998 10:53:00 PM
From: Charles Hughes  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10836
 
>>>Hell, Pascal and Eiffel are probably illegal in Quebec!!! <<<

To Laugh.

BEGIN
I agree begin/end is needlessly verbose. Why so many language designers have decided that humans who invented perfectly good punctuation for this purpose "({[]})" lo those many years ago would be happier if it was in words - well why not end each sentence with "PERIOD" QUESTION MARK
END

In fact, I did what your freind did in reverse when programming in Pascal - defined {} as begin end, and search-replaced them only at the end of the project, when other folks had to read the code.

Object Pascal objects and packaging were a lot like Java, though. Very nice in some ways.

However, if you had ever had to write in COBOL you might forgive the Pascal folks. After all, Pascal was a pretty early effort, just after C I think. Turbo Pascal got sub-1 minute compile times on 2 megahertz cpm 8080 boxes, making possible the first effective IDE.

As I'm sure you know. It was, after all, the product that made Borland.

Chaz



To: Kashish King who wrote (9675)4/1/1998 6:32:00 AM
From: Neil Booth  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10836
 
anglo-centric BEGIN and END

Unlike "for", "while", "if", "static_cast", "class", "struct", "#define", "#pragma" ....

none of which are remotely "anglo-centric" [sic] in the slightest.

Neil.