SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Ligand (LGND) Breakout! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: WTDEC who wrote (18380)3/31/1998 11:53:00 PM
From: Henry Niman  Respond to of 32384
 
Walter, On the surface it looked like SRGN could be bought for a song, but i think that the number of outstanding preferred shares is significant. However, I assume that the company could be acquired through a stock transaction. Here's an early press release on the LLY/SRGN deal:

July 1994:
Lilly licenses Seragen's IL-2 fusion toxin for $45 million

Lilly has licensed Seragen's IL-2 fusion toxin (Phase III, T-cell lymphoma) for exclusive worldwide marketing outside the Far
East in exchange for up to $45 million in research and equity payments.

Lilly will pay (uf)$5mm for 5% of Seragen's stock and $5mm toward the bulk purchase of the product for development and
marketing. A further $10mm is contingent upon research milestones, and Lilly will pay up to $25mm more to exercise certain
options regarding the further license of other fusion toxins. Lilly will assume all development costs while Seragen retains
manufacturing rights and rights to all non-cancer indications. Update 4/97: Lilly has relinquished all development and marketing
rights for non-cancer indications and SRGN molecules. SRGN has agreed to issue $1mm shares to Lilly raising its stake in
Seragen to 10% in return Lilly has agreed to assist Seragen in making certain third-party payments which are due soon.



To: WTDEC who wrote (18380)4/1/1998 7:52:00 AM
From: Mudcat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32384
 
Henry, could you explain why LGND would want the SRGN compound. From reading the thread, it appears this compound is for CTCL and has side effects. Panretin/Targretin are for CTCL and have no side effects and provide superior results. It would appear the SRGN compound couldn't compete with LGNDs drugs, so why would LGND even consider wanting it?