Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Engine who wrote (9826)	4/1/1998 12:49:00 AM
From: slotman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

L.E.. The pr did NOT say "mutually signed". It says Firamada signed. Read it again and come back and apologize for mistakenly misleading the posters here. BTW. Who is it that you think your fooling anyway? thanks rick.

To: Little Engine who wrote (9826)	4/1/1998 1:01:00 AM
From: dexx	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Little Engine, Frankly, I am beginning to understand you. Dexx

To: Little Engine who wrote (9826)	4/1/1998 1:25:00 AM
From: MiriamsSon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Hello to Everyone this is my first post on the Firamada Family Thread. I usually post Yahoo!,its probably time to join SI.For months I have been lurking and appreciating,all of you hard working,loyal,family members.I do not have a family anymore and you guys make me feel really at home,even while I lurked. I bought into this stock with three of my friends,one still is holding,we sold because of this reverse merger deal.I do not wish to go into the last couple of thousand posts but I will say this that Jane is dead on when she said "It never hurts to take a profit." Jane you are a true warrior in this game,my hat goes off to you. MiriamsSon PS-Little Engine you have single-handedly kept everyone focused.Many Thanks.This is what has made this thread so far superior to almost anything else out there.Little Engine your DD has been very welcomed by me and many others.Your call of Atrix was brillant.I do not agree with you most of the time,but you do make me think and its good to have you around.You are the glue that held this thread together.I am not sure if I should Thank You for your "Selfless" efforts.Either way,I do owe you a debt of gratitude because I netted a nice profit by investing in Firamada.Thanks Again,MiriamsSon

To: Little Engine who wrote (9826)	4/1/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: JIN CHUN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

Quit contradicting yourself. Are you saying that ATXI isn't on it's way to delising? I don't think that the NASD or ATXI's major shareholders would agree with you. Check the reg's yourself, look at the chart after the 4 to 1 reverse in December. Actually, everyone should look at the chart after the reverse on 12/16. It closed at 2 1/4 on the 15th, then went to under 2 on the 17th. Multiply that by 4 and the major shareholders lost an instant 75%. Why not post here publicly that ATXI will never be delisted because, as you say, they are not in danger of being delisted so your followers can take you on your word? Jin.

To: Little Engine who wrote (9826)	4/1/1998 12:35:00 PM
From: David A. Irvine	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 27968

Little Engine, I will start with the end of your post that I am responding to: <<< I can read, and do math, Little Engine >>> Apparently, you can't do math very well. Your post-merger 1997 EPS number of $0.20 is incorrect. You calculated that number in this message: Message 3908650 Everyone should re-read it to refresh their memory. You made a simple math/accounting mistake. I assumed somebody would correct you, but I haven't seen it yet (but I still have 90+ posts to catch up on), so I decided to post. Your problem is that you were calculating a backwards-looking post merger EPS for the combined company using the current share total of FAMH of 40 mil. FAMH didn't have 40 mil shares outstanding in 1997. Redo your calculations and you will get something close to 33 cents per share. Pretty close to 36 cents, but we are using estimates and would therefore expect a small difference. I anticipate that you will direct me to the FAMH press release which talked about the merger calculations. In there somewhere, is the year "1998" and the numbers 40 mil, 11 mil, etc. Some people may have been confused because the press release switches between 1997 and 1998 pretty quickly, and does not provide full explanations of some things. I think there also was a typo in the PR (1998 was stated in one case when 1997 should have been used) that was later fixed verbally by FAMH. As I said, redo your calculations using the correct numbers, which will show an EPS of close to 36 cents. Please let us all know what you get. Cheers, Dave OFF TOPIC P.S. Any chance LE is more than one person? P.P.S. Any chance Jane is really a women? P.P.S.S. I get a good laugh out of PWSP. They need to hire someone who can speak English to edit their work.