SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Novell (NOVL) dirt cheap, good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (21494)4/1/1998 2:41:00 AM
From: Elmo Gregory  Respond to of 42771
 
Scott: Is NT 4.0 Y2K compliant or "will be?"

The trouble with NT 5.0: Too close to Year 2000
By Mary Jo Foley, Sm@rt Reseller
March 21, 1998 10:59 AM PST

"We're seeing customers look at NT 4.0 and 5.0 as part of the Year 2000 solution because both of these, like all Microsoft products, will be Year 2000-compliant."

zdnet.com

Elmo



To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (21494)4/1/1998 10:27:00 AM
From: Elmo Gregory  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42771
 
Scott: Microsoft Technical Support: "Windows NT Will Correctly Handle the Year 2000"
support.microsoft.com

Microsoft isn't exactly shouting it from the roof tops.

Elmo



To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (21494)4/1/1998 6:13:00 PM
From: Peter Connolly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 42771
 
Hi Scott

I can't get a straight answer either, from talking to real, live people or looking through web pages. If MS *were* compliant, handled active rollover, leap years etc. with NT4 you can bet that they'd shout about it. Have you ever known MS to keep something like that quiet? Nope, there's something in the offing there, and they're not saying what their plans are.

Peter


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News