To: craig crawford who wrote (6327 ) 4/1/1998 3:34:00 AM From: tbonenyc Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10479
<<Some on this thread would have you believing that CIEN had nothing to offer for several months even for testing. Right Tbone? I tried to dispel that notion to no avail. Well, proof is in the pudding.>> Craig, it's funny that you would make the claim that i would prefer that no one knew about the Multiwave Firefly. Everyone on this thread knows about how you wouldn't discuss the features of the Firefly with me recently. Remember this? excerpt from post #6276: "Actually, in the same post in which i challenged you to come up with the info, i predicted that you would not/could not come up with it. And don't tell me you didn't see that...because you did, in fact, respond by telling me i didn't know what i was talking about. I thought that was quite brilliant and, not to mention, par for the course." Also, It was me, that's right, *ME* that spurred the conversation on the Yahoo board(in January) about this product and how it compared to the Gigamux well before i ever committed substantial(for me) funds to FIBR. That's right Craig, i'm comfortable with Osicom's position on several fronts. So comfortable that, in a possibly overvalued market where a correction or a long-term bear market may be impending, i have decided to sell all of my positions except for DELL(avoiding massive capital gains :), CSCO(this company is too good and networking is where it's at) and FIBR(already obvious). The rest of my money is used for day-trading...much safer at this juncture. Rest assured, i sleep much easier at night than you do. P.S. How many times have you mentioned the Firefly on this board without describing it's inferiority? You seem to have a problem with telling it like it is...maybe that's why it's so easy for you to say "FIBR is a scam". Do you realize that you become more of a joke every time you open your mouth(er...every time you hit that send button)?