Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (31342)	4/1/1998 8:47:00 AM
From: DCBEN	Respond to of 35569

FWIW, here's the URL. Very matter of fact history with conservative time frames and potential statements. How do these compare with the now aging T. Hoare estimates? freeedgar.com Allan

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (31342)	4/1/1998 8:59:00 AM
From: DCBEN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Finally, What to make of this statement in the 10K? >>In conjunction with the independent verification of the chloride leach procedure the Company also commenced the verification of the fire assay test developed by AuRIC for gold, platinum and palladium. The representative from AuRIC met at a third party lab to further evaluate the proscribed gold assay method, overseeing all stages of the process as performed by the technicians at that laboratory. Although the procedure was performed multiple times, the independent laboratory was unable to confirm the values which AuRIC had originally reported to IPM. AuRIC requested time to re-evaluate its method, and determine if any changes in the method had inadvertently occurred when it was transferred to the third-party laboratory. IPM agreed to await AuRIC's pleasure at replicating its fire assay methodology for gold, platinum and palladium, but at this time no date has been set when this will occur.<<