Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JIN CHUN who wrote (9889)	4/1/1998 10:43:00 AM
From: slotman	Respond to of 27968

Thanks Jin, I needed that! Got too worn out last night to keep arguing with the brick wall.

To: JIN CHUN who wrote (9889)	4/1/1998 10:52:00 AM
From: JOHN WHITE	Respond to of 27968

THE SCORE : JIN 79 .... LE 6 I have to admire LE . She keeps loosing and loosing and just keeps coming back for more . Credibility all but gone and still ticking . Like the kid with the bloody nose that just won't say uncle .

To: JIN CHUN who wrote (9889)	4/1/1998 8:30:00 PM
From: Little Engine	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

Jin, you of course realize by now that you are mistaken. Do you wish to revise history by saying that FAMH issued a faulty release, corrected itself to the satisfaction of ATXI, and then (and only then) ATXI issued its angry denial? <<<LOOK AT THE TIME STAMP FROM THE PR'S ON FRIDAY! THE RETRACTION CAME BEFORE ATXI'S RELEASE. QUIT MISLEADING PEOPLE!>>>> Apparently so... hee hee, as you would put it. Who's misleading whom? I know you won't apologize, but some people here will obviously believe such a thing. I mean, it's in CAPITAL LETTERS and everything. The release from FAMH issuing the correction came out at Friday March 27, 6:38 pm Eastern Time, according to Post #8614 of Markox5. About an hour after ATXI slapped back, as I recall. After a couple days, once the tit-for-tat debate between the two companies had subsided, the news services removed both: A) the original version of FAMH's press release, and B) the correction notice that followed. No need for either, since the original is now corrected, and the corrected version is posted in the original's place. Slotman now quotes the corrected version (ad nauseam) as proof that FAMH never claimed to have a mutual letter signed. Again, the original SI posts contain the original release. Anyone can look them up. Please don't rewrite history.