Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Freddie Forte who wrote (9923)	4/1/1998 11:28:00 AM
From: JOEY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27968

First page of 4 page fax: It is on Leibman & Oesch LLP stationary: " Please be advised that as of March 30, 1998, Firamada, and/or its designee, has acquired in public market transactions and now owns or controls 5.09% of the outstanding common stock of Atrix International, Inc. Firamada, Inc, shall cause to have filed with the SEC the proper notice documents within the manner and time prescribed by statute. Very truly yours Neil M Leibman

To: Freddie Forte who wrote (9923)	4/1/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: LoneWolf	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

We ran into this situation of false releases over on the RMIL thread, and after talking to a securities lawyer, Only those that sold shortly after the false posting, and incourred an actual "loss" then they would have grounds for a lawsuit. So, if anyone bought over .61 and sold today at .60 because of the bogus post, they would have grounds. If you hold on to your shares, then it is only consitered a "paper loss" and won't hold up too well in a court. I know this sucks, but this is the way it is. ONLY THE COMPANY CAN SUE THE POSTER FOR SLANDER (criminal) and those shareholders that sold at a loss can sue for damages (civil). If I'm wrong, please correct me, or contact the nearest securties lawyer. LW