SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Thomas M. who wrote (30734)4/1/1998 4:00:00 PM
From: Profits  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572942
 
Thomas,

As of yet, I'm sure AMD is still recouping the investment in Fab 25 and Fab 30. Obviously, AMD has lost money on K6 production so far. They need to build in excess of 2MU per quarter to be profitable. With the forecast of 15MU in 1998, their future is looking pretty good. As far as Flash, AMD was the only Flash supplier to make money in 1997. Intel lost $100M on Flash, Atmel lost $160M in Q497 alone. That is because all of AMD's Flash devices are built on 0.35u technology. Intel is still using 0.6um and 0.4um process technology. In fact, Intel just announced they were obsoleting all of their 0.6um Flash parts because they were losing money in Flash. Another great opportunity for AMD to gain Flash marketshare.

Profits



To: Thomas M. who wrote (30734)4/1/1998 7:46:00 PM
From: Kenith Lee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572942
 
Does AMD break down its profits by divisions? I have heard the allegation that AMD loses money
on the K6, and the counterclaim that AMD loses money in flash, etc., and makes money in CPUs


Thomas,

You probably heard it from the Intellopers. Unlike Intel, AMD does provide division break downs. amd.com

FYI, AMD made money on Flash during Q4. I doubt Intel did.