Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NAMX -- North American Expl.-- Que Sera Sera! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cAPSLOCK who wrote (3233)	4/1/1998 5:03:00 PM
From: Hunter Vann	Respond to of 4736

I sort of liked this one better. What's the deal with these Utah companies? www3.techstocks.com

To: cAPSLOCK who wrote (3233)	4/1/1998 5:19:00 PM
From: M. M. Jones	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4736

Pretty funny. Is it for real? :-) Doesn't anyone care that UPR is mulling over selling its gas gathering operations? M.M.

To: cAPSLOCK who wrote (3233)	4/1/1998 5:24:00 PM
From: M. M. Jones	Respond to of 4736

OFF TOPIC *** Judge quashes Paula Jones lawsuit vs. Clinton - sources The judge hearing Paula Jones' sexual harassment case against President Bill Clinton has dismissed the case, sources close to Jones' legal team said Wednesday. U.S. District Court Judge Susan Webber Wright made the ruling in response to a submission by Clinton's lawyers that Jones had failed to show evidence that she had been damaged by then Arkansas-Gov. Clinton's alleged harassment in May 1991 at a Little Rock, Ark., hotel. Asked if Jones' legal team would appeal the ruling, the source said: "At this point, we need to just look at the order and see what's happening." Urging Wright to dismiss the the politically charged lawsuit, Clinton's lawyers argued that Jones had not shown she had suffered harm to her career, even if Clinton had exposed himself to her and asked for oral sex as Jones alleged. Clinton denied her charge. Wright agreed with their argument in her ruling, saying that there were "no genuine issues for trial in this case." (Reuters)