Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : ECHARTERS -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E. Charters who wrote (2497)	4/1/1998 8:52:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3744

I wonder if there are any memos in Barrick that tell the tale?, I bet they are long burned up and erased. I can see some sort of round table discussions about BRE-X and the lack of proof. Apparently Barrick wanted to do DD and was refused, and that is why they went no further. Munk might have salivated, but those that can get fired exercised caution and Barrick stepped back from the brink. Can you imagine the flap in Barrick bouhgt BRE-X and paid and then got fired. The firings would sound like a machine gun,. huge SH suits agin Munk and all breathing Barrick things. So we all want to know why did Barrick step back. Sure knowledge of a crime?, doubts? suspicions? or was it procedural... Barrick always does DD, and since BRE-X would not allow DD, the deal died then and there, with no real suspicions. Bill