SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Shahen Petrosian who wrote (51875)4/1/1998 10:18:00 PM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 186894
 
Shanen,

People behave similarly with cars as well. The price of a car drops drastically as soon as you drive off the lot, yet.

there is a big difference between CPUs and cars. The reason for price brake is that the car becomes a used car. But if you buy the same model of the car at beginning of the model year, or at the end, the price will be almost the same.

But your new P-II 300MHz went from $1,850 when it was introduced (less than a year ago) to $361 today. That's 81.5% reduction in less than 12 months.

news.com

In a previous post someone posted that Intel won't be able to add cache to the low end because they won't be able to justify the prices at the higher end. To that I'd like to add that MHZ will take care of that as it has in the past. 400Mhz PII's are about to be announced this month.

Also, the Slot 2 chips will be introduced later this year. Those will be the real high end. The 350 and 400 MHz Slot 1 chips will be the mid-range by Christmas.

Joe



To: Shahen Petrosian who wrote (51875)4/2/1998 12:20:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Respond to of 186894
 
Shahen, >>"

For all its worth, I am of the opinion that a cacheless Celeron is not going to be the sole low end
Intel presence for long. I think the usual trickle down price drop will manifest itself in the form of
added cache in the low end."<<

Yes, and it's already announced by Intel. The second Celeron, Mendocino, has L2 cache, and plenty of it. This may be pointed out in a previous post. I'm just responding as I read.

Tony