SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (31384)4/2/1998 7:02:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella  Respond to of 35569
 
Larry, he worked overtime? <VBG>



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (31384)4/2/1998 9:34:00 PM
From: knight  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Larry, the insider remuneration sure seems high compared to other grassroots enterprises. I wonder if institutional buyers take this kind of stuff into consideration when they invest in these little Co's? It may not make any difference to creative financiers as they don't stick around too long, but for somebody buying the stock based on management, it could have an impact. The scary part is; will the current BOD p*ss away any new financing in the same fashion?



To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (31384)4/3/1998 12:03:00 AM
From: BillyZoom  Respond to of 35569
 
I'm not here to defend Furlongs compensation vs his performance. From a corporate viewpoint though the compensations for fiscal 97 were determined when the market cap for the company was approx. $180,000,000 and they had cash in the bank. Based on the financials at that time the compensations were not necessarily that out of line. If they were paid the same salaries with the current market cap and cash flow that would be a different matter.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News